Required Field Validation in ETL Workflows

Practical data validation articles for ETL workflows, source files, and automated data quality checks.

Advanced ETL Processor
4.9 ★★★★★ Based on 16 reviews on Capterra See all reviews on Capterra →

Required field validation checks that the fields your process depends on are actually present. Advanced ETL Processor Enterprise validates mandatory fields inside a visual ETL workflow, rejects or routes incomplete rows, logs the missing field, and keeps the original source data unchanged. It sounds obvious, right up until a customer ID vanishes from a source file and your import starts behaving like a form with commitment issues.

Required field validation rule in Advanced ETL Processor

Use it before the first load

Required field validation belongs near the start of the ETL workflow. If an order number, customer code, invoice date, or account ID is empty, there is no point loading the row and hoping a report will forgive you later.

The validation rule stops the record, logs the issue, and sends the bad row to an exception path. That keeps the original data untouched and gives support staff something useful to inspect.

What to validate

  • Primary business keys such as customer ID, invoice number, or order number.
  • Dates needed for reporting, scheduling, or reconciliation.
  • Status fields used by later workflow decisions.
  • Any field used in joins, lookups, or database constraints.

When not to use it

Do not mark every field as required just because the form looks tidier that way. Optional notes, secondary phone numbers, and unused legacy columns remain optional. Over-validating data creates noise, and noisy validation logs are where good rules go to retire.

Useful references

For broader context, see the three types of data validation, chaining multiple data validations, and IBM's overview of data validation.

Video

Next steps

If this validation rule belongs in a repeatable ETL process, configure it in the Validator object, test it on a sample file, then decide whether failed rows should be rejected, logged, or routed for review.

Keep the original data unchanged. Raw files are still the witness statement.