Cloud Storage

More
4 years 5 months ago #19095 by IMS
Cloud Storage was created by IMS
We are running AETL Enterprise 6.3.4.11 and whenever we drop a Cloud Storage object into a package and then try to configure it, we are getting an Access Violation error.

Also, should we see any type of Cloud Storage entry under the Connections in the project to configure? We don't have any Cloud Storage connection types in the left hand palette. We have all the usual connection types (MS SQL Server, FTP, Sales Force, etc) but no Cloud Storage.

Not sure if we should or not?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
4 years 5 months ago #19098 by admin
Replied by admin on topic Cloud Storage
Yo probably need to patch the repository as described here

www.etl-tools.com/articles/cloud-storage.html

Mike
ETL Architect

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
4 years 5 months ago #19100 by IMS
Replied by IMS on topic Cloud Storage
Thanks - that looks like it did the trick. We had everything in the repository except for the following from the patch:

INSERT INTO OBJECTS_TREE
(OBJECT_ID,
PARENT_ID,
NAME,
OBJECT_TYPE
)
Select
OBJECT_ID*-4 as OBJECT_ID,
PARENT_ID,
'Cloud Storage' as NAME,
905 as OBJECT_TYPE
From
OBJECTS_TREE
where OBJECTS_TREE.OBJECT_TYPE=322

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
4 years 5 months ago #19103 by admin
Replied by admin on topic Cloud Storage
Great.

BTW can you see MongoDB in the list of connections?
If not you may need to do more patching

Mike
ETL Architect

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
4 years 5 months ago #19106 by IMS
Replied by IMS on topic Cloud Storage
Yes, we have MongoDB. I was pretty diligent about getting all the patching in place and also went through the create table scripts from the installer to compare all the tables and field types. We had everything pretty close and just missed this one for the record entries.

Hopefully we didn't miss anything else.

FWIW, it would have been very helpful if the installer would have alerted us to needing the repository patches or even taken care of them itself.

We were not aware of needing to do all the patching until we fired the new version up and it immediately started complaining about the missing nodes tables.

That lead us to do some digging and found most of the patching details to get the repository up to date.

We did however have an issue where the new version wiped out all of our global variables and email notification settings.

Thankfully we had a backup copy of the variable list available and were able to recreate the global vars without a considerable amount of effort.

We love the product and all the awesome stuff it does and most of the time we don't see any issues at all when upgrading versions - that lead us to be a little loose with our typical upgrade approach (we were a bit sloppy since we are used to the upgrades always being quick, easy and pretty much brainless).

Lesson learned. :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.