Suggestions for improvement
- KlausJVoigt
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
Less
More
9 years 2 months ago #10674
by KlausJVoigt
Suggestions for improvement was created by KlausJVoigt
Hi,
i want to make some suggestions to improve ATE:
1. A long time ago i had already suggested to make the ATE multilingual.
How is that?
2. Possibility for a site license to store centrally instead the licensing for each installation to make individually. This would be save a lot of time.
3. Possibility of individual row heights and font resizing.
Many users is the table view much too small.
4. Possibility of calling an item directly by using the exe. Example:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\DB Software Laboratory\Active Table Editor\ATEditor.exe" User=XXXXXX;Password=XXXXXX;Item=XXXXXX
In this case the outlook bar should be not visible.
Thus, the integration into existing systems would be much more successful, as targeted with the minimally necessary table can be addressed.
I would be very happy (and i think many other users too) if these suggestions were implemented.
With best regards
Klaus
i want to make some suggestions to improve ATE:
1. A long time ago i had already suggested to make the ATE multilingual.
How is that?
2. Possibility for a site license to store centrally instead the licensing for each installation to make individually. This would be save a lot of time.
3. Possibility of individual row heights and font resizing.
Many users is the table view much too small.
4. Possibility of calling an item directly by using the exe. Example:
"C:\Program Files (x86)\DB Software Laboratory\Active Table Editor\ATEditor.exe" User=XXXXXX;Password=XXXXXX;Item=XXXXXX
In this case the outlook bar should be not visible.
Thus, the integration into existing systems would be much more successful, as targeted with the minimally necessary table can be addressed.
I would be very happy (and i think many other users too) if these suggestions were implemented.
With best regards
Klaus
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 2 months ago #10676
by admin
Mike
ETL Architect
Replied by admin on topic Suggestions for improvement
3 and 4 should be easy to implement,
1 and 2 is a completely different story.
We will let you know once it is ready
John
1 and 2 is a completely different story.
We will let you know once it is ready
John
Mike
ETL Architect
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 2 months ago #10742
by admin
Mike
ETL Architect
Replied by admin on topic Suggestions for improvement
Hello
As promised we have implemented ability to change grid font site and grid row height
We have also added two new command line parameters
User=Administrator;Password=Administrator;HideOutlookBar;ItemId=1001
As promised we have implemented ability to change grid font site and grid row height
We have also added two new command line parameters
User=Administrator;Password=Administrator;HideOutlookBar;ItemId=1001
Mike
ETL Architect
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- KlausJVoigt
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
9 years 2 months ago #10745
by KlausJVoigt
Replied by KlausJVoigt on topic Suggestions for improvement
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
9 years 2 months ago #10746
by admin
Mike
ETL Architect
Replied by admin on topic Suggestions for improvement
For item n3 I am really confused.
It is is already doing everything you need Am I missing something?
Mike
It is is already doing everything you need Am I missing something?
Mike
Mike
ETL Architect
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- KlausJVoigt
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
-
9 years 2 months ago #10748
by KlausJVoigt
Replied by KlausJVoigt on topic Suggestions for improvement
Hi Mike,
if possible our users should not be able to make changes in the repository definitions (main options).
But to use the built-in Options in this way, i have to show them the change mode for all options. I would like to avoid this. Therefore, my proposed amendment.
Klaus
if possible our users should not be able to make changes in the repository definitions (main options).
But to use the built-in Options in this way, i have to show them the change mode for all options. I would like to avoid this. Therefore, my proposed amendment.
Klaus
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.